Their big-fat-royal wedding (A joke or should I watch it live?)

By Mihalis Kavaratzis

Earlier today I went to buy a new lighter. The lady in the shop said: “We have on offer these royal-wedding lighters; same price as a normal one – only today and tomorrow.” It was  a lighter featuring the faces of Prince William and Princess-to-be Kate. The date of the incident: 28th April 2011, the day before the royal wedding in England. The place of the incident is more interesting: the centre of Budapest, Hungary. Then I remembered that the week before, two (as far as I know) popular lifestyle magazines in Hungary published a 20-page supplement on the royal wedding. Then I remembered the cups, mugs, plates, silver spoons, scarves and all the rest of royal wedding paraphernalia I had seen in England. Then I went to check my emails and the internet as I do every day. The Greek news-site that I normally check had two separate articles on the royal wedding on its home page!

I’d like to state my personal view that monarchies are remnants of a past that mankind should be trying to forget. I also find all this a bold and quite disturbing exaggeration. As tempted as I am to dismiss the whole thing as a joke, the place promotion aspects of the wedding cannot escape our attention. The royal wedding fits only too well with the current trend of storytelling within place marketing and, especially, destination marketing. It’s the perfect fairytale: The handsome(?) prince, the beautiful girl that the prince falls in love with, the glamorous guests, the magnificent ceremony and – oh! the dress… Then they will have a child, then he will be crowned King, then they will have more children, then they will (although I don’t wish that) divorce, then he will find another princess. All these will remind us of the previous episode in the royal soap-opera (that of Princess Diana) and the press around the world will keep talking about them. And with them about England. Because, whether we like it or not, the royal family is a steady contributor to England’s image and reputation; most commonly, in a much more positive way than, say, British foreign policy or ‘Euroscepticism’.

Yes, the wedding must cost a lot. Doesn’t the publicity it brings make the investment worth it? Live coverage by CNN and other channels, endless news reports all over the world, tourists flying in just to be there on the special day, books and photo albums published all over the world. This is admirable publicity that money cannot buy. After the ceremony, the royal couple will get on their golden carriage and starting from Westminster Abbey, they will pass by major London attractions before they reach Buckingham Palace. So the world will be reminded of some of the things that make London what it is; not via an unreliable TV commercial but via real life. Hundreds of thousands of crowds will flood the streets and as soon as the newly-weds kiss on the balcony, the street-parties all over England will start, letting everyone participate in the celebration. If that’s not good place promotion I don’t know what is.

On a more serious note, all that the royal wedding brings is publicity. Place marketing and branding need so much more: vision, consistency, transparency etc. In my view, the wedding might be providing something else, equally important: it connects the past with the future, which is something all place brands want to do but very few (if any) manage. It builds on the heritage (English monarchy and all this symbolizes – good and bad) to connect with the future (say, the hope that the modern, sporty and dynamic, soon-to-be King might change certain things), providing a guarantee of continuity. I will not sit in front of CNN tomorrow as I will be writing about place identity and place branding. Come to think of it, I probably should sit in front of CNN.

This entry was posted in opinions. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Their big-fat-royal wedding (A joke or should I watch it live?)

  1. Pepi says:

    Although we all hate, or at least the majority, to invest time on this wedding, I strongly agrre that for some people it replresents a fairy tale. And we all need fairy tales!

    • Ares says:

      I agree that we all need fairy tales, but I’d rather have the ones that don’t pretend to be true.

  2. Ares says:

    Alexandrian Kings
    (by C.P. Cavafy)

    The Alexandrians were gathered
    to see Cleopatra’s children,
    Caesarion, and his little brothers,
    Alexander and Ptolemy, whom for the first
    time they lead out to the Gymnasium,
    there to proclaim kings,
    in front of the grand assembly of the soldiers.

    Alexander — they named him king
    of Armenia, Media, and the Parthians.
    Ptolemy — they named him king
    of Cilicia, Syria, and Phoenicia.
    Caesarion stood more to the front,
    dressed in rose-colored silk,
    on his breast a bouquet of hyacinths,
    his belt a double row of sapphires and amethysts,
    his shoes fastened with white
    ribbons embroidered with rose pearls.
    Him they named more than the younger ones,
    him they named King of Kings.

    The Alexandrians of course understood
    that those were theatrical words.

    But the day was warm and poetic,
    the sky was a light azure,
    the Alexandrian Gymnasium was
    a triumphant achievement of art,
    the opulence of the courtiers was extraordinary,
    Caesarion was full of grace and beauty
    (son of Cleopatra, blood of the Lagidae);
    and the Alexandrians rushed to the ceremony,
    and got enthusiastic, and cheered
    in greek, and egyptian, and some in hebrew,
    enchanted by the beautiful spectacle —
    although they full well knew what all these were worth,
    what hollow words these kingships were.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s